Monday, 1 August 2011

What's so great about teaching evolution?

Religious types hate their children being taught about evolution in school science class because it clashes with their beliefs. On the one hand those beliefs are wrong. On the other hand, however true it is, evolutionary theory is neither useful knowledge or training for children and could be dropped from the curriculum without doing any harm to their education.

Why is it so important to teach the theory of evolution to school children?

1. It is true

Yes, but so are lots of things that we don't teach in school, either because they're too difficult (Einstinian physics) or we don't think they're important (like the history of other people's religions).

2. It is useful to know

No, in almost any line of work, including much of the life-sciences, knowledge of evolutionary theory will never be directly relevant (any more than driving a car requires a deep understanding of the principles of an internal combustion engine).

At the societal level, as far as biology goes, understanding germ theory and the attendant public health issues (especially vaccination) is far more important to have entrenched in our civic common sense.

3. It's important for understanding how scientific methodology works

This is only an issue if creationism is taught in the biology class as science. Otherwise students will pick up all they need to know about how science works in their studies of other areas of biology, physics, etc.

Why should we drop evolution?

1. It's a political issue

As Daniel Dennet has said, evolutionary theory “eats through just about every traditional concept, and leaves in its wake a revolutionized world-view, with most of the old landmarks still recognizable, but transformed in fundamental ways.”

Isn't it reasonable not to want one's cherished beliefs dissolved by acid? Doesn't it interfere with your ability to raise your children with your traditional values? What we teach our children is a matter of collective choice about our values - not a reading off of the truths of nature - and therefore something that political communities can and should democratically debate about and compromise on if necessary.

2. It's a culture wars thing

There's no real reason for liberals to be so invested in this obscure curricular issue apart from the culture wars. It's a shibboleth whose only significance is as an indicator that the weirdo religious people, with whom we enlightenment liberals unfortunately have to share our society, are 'winning'.

3. It's a distraction

Even within the culture wars arena there are other issues it is much more important to win. For example, mandatory sex education would be far more useful for children's lives than reading about evolutionary theory.

4 comments:

  1. This is quite filled with fallacies and nonsense. I hope people don't take this blog seriously.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Too bad you couldn't give even one example. Without that such comments are hard to take seriously.

      Delete
  2. This is willful ignorance. We shouldn't tip-toe around evolution simply because it upsets some people. They have the right to know about a well established scientific theory that help peoples' understanding of biology and biodiversity.

    Not teaching evolution is like not teaching limits, or solving limits through first principles, as no mathematicians solve equations this way; everything can be learned without solving with first principles.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Avoiding divisive metaphysical issues is central to how politics works. Otherwise we would never have gotten out of the 17th century wars of religion.

      Many religious people object to having a state institution effectively tell their children with all the authority of the education system that their beliefs are wrong. I just don't see that as altogether unreasonable. America has a long tradition of democratic local control of education curricula, and a strong constitutional principle of separating state from religion. There seems to me not only a strong democratic argument for allowing a community significant leeway over what is taught and how, but also some constitutional protection. (I don't mean of course that this allows religious people to decide what science is, but rather which parts of science should be taught).

      Please, look beyond the truth issue. Ask yourself if teaching evolution in schools really matters so much that it is worth all this political capital. After all according to this Gallup poll even after all the decades of teaching it in public schools only about 40% of Americans believe in it. And yet the rest still manage to live normal lives.

      Delete

If you have trouble posting your comment, try using a different browser.